The American Medical Association states

The American Medical Association states that circumcision, properly performed, protects against the development of phimosis.[13] Rickwood and other authors have argued that many infant circumcisions are performed unnecessarily for developmental non-retractability of the prepuce rather than for pathological phimosis.[194][195] Metcalfe et al. stated that "Gairdner[154] and Oster[196] made a strong case for leaving boys uncircumcised, allowing the natural separation of the foreskin from the glans to take place gradually, and instructing boys in proper hygiene. This obviates the need for 'preventive' circumcision."[197] In a study to determine the most cost-effective treatment for phimosis, Van Howe concluded that using cream was 75% more cost-effective than circumcision at treating pathological phimosis.[198]
solar panels for home use
windows double glazed